Nelly Follett
|Subscribers
About
Nandrolone: Uses, Benefits & Side Effects
Nandrolone – A Comprehensive Guide
1. What is Nandrolone?
Nandrolone (also known as nandrolone decanoate or 19-nortestosterone) is a synthetic anabolic‑steroid hormone derived from testosterone. It was first synthesized in the 1950s and has since been used for a variety of medical indications, such as:
Indication Typical Use
Anemia (especially due to chronic kidney disease) Stimulates erythropoiesis (red‑cell production)
Osteoporosis & bone loss Enhances bone density in postmenopausal women
Muscle wasting diseases (e.g., HIV, cancer cachexia) Counteracts muscle atrophy
Certain endocrine disorders Corrects hormone deficiencies
In the sports world, athletes have used nandrolone (an anabolic steroid related to nandrolone decanoate, a synthetic form of nandrolone) to enhance performance, leading to its status as a banned substance by major anti‑doping agencies.
---
2. How Nandrolone Works: Biological Mechanisms
2.1 Androgen Receptor (AR) Activation
Binding: Nandrolone enters the cell and binds with high affinity to the intracellular androgen receptor.
Conformational Change: Upon ligand binding, AR undergoes a conformational shift that allows it to translocate from the cytoplasm into the nucleus.
DNA Binding: Inside the nucleus, the AR–nandrolone complex attaches to androgen response elements (AREs) in the promoter regions of target genes.
2.2 Transcriptional Regulation
Upregulated Genes:
- Myogenic regulatory factors: MyoD, myogenin.
- Structural proteins: Desmin, troponin T/C, dystrophin, α-actinin.
- Growth and repair proteins: IGF‑1, insulin‑like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs).
Downregulated Genes:
- Proteins that antagonize muscle growth: myostatin, follistatin-binding proteins.
2.3 Post‑Transcriptional Effects
Enhanced mRNA stability for structural proteins.
Increased translation efficiency via upregulation of ribosomal biogenesis factors (e.g., RPS6, eIF4E).
3. Cellular Consequences – What the Cell Actually Does
Stage Effect
Protein synthesis > 30‑50 % increase in total protein output; rapid assembly of contractile units.
Sarcomere formation New sarcomeres form from pre‑existing Z‑lines; elongation and alignment occur along the myofibrillar axis.
Actin filament extension Thin filaments grow by adding actin subunits at the barbed ends, extending toward the M‑line.
Cross‑bridge formation More myosin heads available → increased cross‑bridge cycling rate.
Myofibril compaction Myofibrils become thinner and more densely packed, improving force transmission per unit volume.
Resulting changes in mechanical properties
Property Before / After (Relative) Explanation
Maximal isometric tension (σ₀) ↑ by ~1.5–2× More cross‑bridges and higher myofibril density.
Elastic modulus (E) of the fiber ↑ by 30–50 % Myofibrils act as stiff internal filaments; increased density raises stiffness.
Strain to failure ↓ slightly (10–15 %) Denser myofilament packing reduces slack but increases brittleness.
Energy dissipation per cycle ↓ (lower hysteresis) More efficient cross‑bridge cycling with less viscoelastic loss.
These changes are consistent across species and correlate with the increased myofibril density measured by electron microscopy or X‑ray diffraction.
---
2. Why do these mechanical changes arise?
Structural factor How it influences mechanics
Myofibril density (number of sarcomeres per unit volume) Higher packing reduces the compliance contributed by inter‑filament spaces; the elastic modulus rises as more contractile elements bear load.
Sarcomere length distribution A tighter, shorter sarcomere population limits the amount of strain that can be accommodated before actin–myosin cross‑bridge overlap is lost, reducing extensibility and increasing peak force at a given deformation.
Cross‑bridge kinetics (attachment/detachment rates) If cross‑bridges stay attached longer (slower detachment), more are simultaneously generating force; this increases maximal tension.
Passive connective tissue content More collagen or elastin can stiffen the overall tissue, contributing to higher stiffness and a lower capacity for elastic deformation.
---
4 Implications for the design of the artificial muscle
Design goal Effect of altered mechanical properties
High peak force A muscle that behaves like the "stiffened" natural tissue can deliver larger forces with less strain, allowing a more compact actuator. It would require a higher power density from the motor/actuator because it must overcome greater resistance during contraction.
Low compliance / stiffness matching Using a material that has a similar stiffness to the stiffened muscle ensures that the artificial joint does not feel "soft" or "spongy." This improves stability and reduces unwanted oscillations, especially important for fast dynamic movements.
Reduced energy loss A stiffer actuator may dissipate less mechanical energy in bending or twisting, improving overall efficiency. However, it also needs to be designed to avoid excessive heat generation from the motor during high-force operations.
Control bandwidth / responsiveness The increased stiffness requires a controller with higher bandwidth and precision to track desired trajectories accurately without lag or overshoot. This may demand more advanced sensors (force/torque) and faster actuators.
---
Practical Steps for Implementation
Model the Musculoskeletal System
- Use musculoskeletal simulation tools (e.g., OpenSim, AnyBody) to estimate muscle activation patterns during the target tasks.
- Translate these activations into desired joint torque profiles.
Design the Actuator
- Select a motor or series‑elastic actuator that can deliver the required torque with sufficient speed and bandwidth.
- Include compliance (series elastic element) if needed to emulate muscle–tendon behavior.
Control Strategy
- Implement torque‑control loops with feedback from joint sensors (encoders, force/torque sensors).
- Use feedforward terms derived from the musculoskeletal model to anticipate torque demands.
Testing and Validation
- Compare the system’s joint trajectories and torque outputs against the original human data.
- Iterate on actuator selection or control tuning until performance matches the desired level of human‑like force.
---
3. Conclusion
By focusing on a specific joint (the wrist in this example) we can:
Identify which muscles produce the needed forces and how they are recruited.
Translate that muscle recruitment into a set of torque requirements for the joint.
Select an actuator whose force‑production characteristics match those torque demands, or design a new actuator if necessary.
This systematic approach ensures that the artificial system can generate the same level of human‑like force as observed in the biological data.